Kindness

God, to you all hearts are open, to you all longings speak, and to you no secret thing is hidden. I beg you—purify the intentions1 of my heart through the unspeakable2 gift of your grace, so I can love you with all I am and praise you for all you are. Amen.

God, unto Whom alle hertes ben open, and unto Whom alle wille spekith, and unto Whom no privé thing is hid: I beseche Thee so for to clense the entent of myn hert with the unspekable gift of Thi grace that I may parfiteliche love Thee, and worthilich preise Thee. Amen.

Kindness

This past weekend the Very Reverend Gary Jones, Interim Dean at Christ Church Cathedral in Houston, invited me to give some talks, lead an experiential, I did Centering Prayer, and preach twice at 9 and 11. So I did. Gary is exceptionally kind and wise, also brilliant and a contemplative. Those are a combination the world needs more of. Thank you, Gary. He and his wife, Cherry, are so welcoming, as was the whole community. Thank you, everyone, for giving me such a warm welcome. I can’t (yet) say in words how much it meant and means—thank you for gifting me with such genuine dialogue, much appreciated.

So I took a copy of the Cloud of Unknowing and of Practice of the Presence with me. It was the fifth Sunday in Lent, where the community reads about Lazarus being raised from the dead, and I’m always happy to consider resurrections, personal and societal, and for nature, injured as this wonder is by greed.

At another time I will write about my time behind the rood screen and among the mirrored skyscrapers where the blue sky and white clouds were reflected. It was a kind of resurrection for me, for diverse reasons. First I want to have digested the experiences fully. I’m still ruminating on them gratefully.

Right now I want to sing again what I did in the 11am service, known to me as the Prayer for the Preface to the Cloud of Unknowing. For a long time I’ve sung it in Middle English, over ten years now, in fact. But I’d never sung my Modern English translation of it. If you want to see me sing it there in Modern English and listen to my 15-minute sermon, you can go to vimeo here: https://vimeo.com/809526246 “3/26/23 Acevedo Butcher: The Fifth Sunday in Lent.” I so appreciate that they included both my last names.

The song or tune for this prayer was inspired by my preparing as I do by reading and thinking, watching CCC’s third week in Lent’s service (where Bradley read it, in fact, from the communal prayerbook, and that sparked in me), and many times praying “What should I do?” as I walked through the marsh, holding this prayer.

How that song came about was the same as with the Middle English. I start out saying it in lectio divina, on a note card on which I’ve written it. And eventually somehow it becomes singing, sung, a song. Sometimes it sounds one way and then another and eventually it settles into a sort of way that is repeated and now I can sing it in that settled version.

It started, this song, in the marsh. Among egrets flying and squawking plus ducks, geese, red-tailed hawks, swallows, pelicans, too. I sing it first in Modern, then in Middle English, and after that read the two footnotes from my translation of the Cloud. You could also substitute for “God” here “Love” or even “Kindness,” since that’s the heart of all major religions and wisdom traditions—kindness, to ourselves and to others—connecting with our True Self, which is/who is Kindness.

God, to you all hearts are open, to you all longings speak, and to you no secret thing is hidden. I beg you—purify the intentions1 of my heart through the unspeakable2 gift of your grace, so I can love you with all I am and praise you for all you are. Amen.

God, unto Whom alle hertes ben open, and unto Whom alle wille spekith, and unto Whom no privé thing is hid: I beseche Thee so for to clense the entent of myn hert with the unspekable gift of Thi grace that I may parfiteliche love Thee, and worthilich preise Thee. Amen.

Here are the footnotes from my translation:

1. The Cloud author uses the Middle English entent (“intent”) often, reminding us that his theme is the exercise of “stretching” towards God. See Gallacher, ed., The Cloud of Unknowing, 21, line 3. With his background in Latin, he well knew that the word entent (our intent)comes from the Latin in-, “toward,” and from tendere, “to stretch,” so to be “intent” on something is literally “to stretch towards it.” This anonymous monk shows us how we can “stretch” our minds towards God in contemplation and grow spiritually, becoming people who “make peace” (James 3:18). Intense, tendon, attention, attend, attentive,and extend share this Latin root for “to stretch.” 

2. In Middle English, this prayer reads: “God, unto Whom alle hertes ben open, and unto Whom alle wille spekith, and unto Whom no privé thing is hid: I beseche Thee so for to clense the entent of myn hert with the unspekable gift of Thi grace that I may parfiteliche love Thee, and worthilich preise Thee. Amen.” See Gallacher, ed., The Cloud of Unknowing, 21, lines 2-5. Here we find a splendid example of the author’s play on the words “speak” and “unspeakable,” highlighting that God listens to us when “alle wille” (“all longings”)“spekith” (“speak”) to himand that he answers our articulated or “spoken” longings with “the unspekable gift” (“the unspeakable gift”) of his grace. We “speak” and in return are given an “unspekable” (“ineffable”) gift, his grace. This word play deftly suggests the mystery of a dialogue between our chatter and a profound silence. This prayer is also the short opening prayer (or collect) before the epistle in the Roman Catholic votive Mass of the Holy Spirit (Ad postulandam gratiam Spiritus Sancti), with one difference. The anonymous author has slightly changed the original Latin version. Originally, the prayer addressed the unspeakable gift “of your Holy Spirit,” not “of your grace.” The author revised it to focus on God’s grace. His use and revision of this liturgical prayer reveal his belief that grace and the Holy Spirit are closely related, that the Holy Spirit informs contemplative prayer, that grace is the sine qua non of contemplation, and that communal prayer is central to spiritual growth.

God, to you all hearts are open, to you all longings speak, and to you no secret thing is hidden. I beg you—purify the intentions1 of my heart through the unspeakable2 gift of your grace, so I can love you with all I am and praise you for all you are. Amen.

God, unto Whom alle hertes ben open, and unto Whom alle wille spekith, and unto Whom no privé thing is hid: I beseche Thee so for to clense the entent of myn hert with the unspekable gift of Thi grace that I may parfiteliche love Thee, and worthilich preise Thee. Amen

Thank you for being here and I hope these bring peace and joy to you.

Contemplation

As always, if you prefer listening, this blog is also posted, read by Carmen, on her YouTube channel here: CarmenAcevedoButcherPresence.

What happens inside the mind-heart-soul-self-body-&-all-that-makes-you-sing if (for your own healing and out of your own great need for peace and rest and meaning) you’ve spent your entire life focused on and steeped in the mystery of Silence which has always drawn you to it, which is a pure gift, and which some call meditation or prayer, and to you seems as ordinary and regular as flossing your teeth, and if you’ve also been soul-tugged into and focused on and steeped in translating and being translated by some of the major texts in that field, like Cloud of Unknowing, Book of Privy Counsel, Brother Lawrence’s Practice of the Presence, Hildegard, Benedict, Julian, and more, and then a new friend very kind, wise, thoughtful, and smart asks you,

“What is contemplation?”

Recently, Paul Swanson invited me over for a conversation on his cool podcast Contemplify. Again, Paul is gentle of soul, thoughtful, and the kind of profoundly brilliant that is based on active listening and much reading, and he puts you at ease.

Since I deal with severe anxiety on a daily basis, I appreciate such kindness deeply.

We also discovered we have the same Jack Baumwerk “Go on, Brother Lawrence” print.

Again, at one point Paul asked me something like What comes to mind when I hear the word contemplation. This alchemized a cocktail of feelings and thoughts and experiences in me.

His question distilled countless hours of being out in nature growing up, often alone, escaping distress and trauma at home, peering at tadpoles and returning and watching them grow, catching and letting go crawdads, watching them scoot backwards, squinting at red-tailed hawks banking in the sun, picking up fossils, and stalking and steeping in the presence of trees in dense pine forests. Feeling lonely yet not alone.

Paul’s good question sent my mind riffling through digital pages of the OED and etymologies. Reminded my bones of sitting eternities with my little word, itching to get up, restless. Did the timer go off yet? Should I write that thought down? One eye open: How much time is left? Still 15 minutes?

And the most natural form of meditation for someone who has ADHD like me: Walking, walking, walking, walking, walking, walking, in Macedonia, Athens, and Rome, Georgia; London; Hereford; Heidelberg; Seoul; Huntsville, Alabama; Berkeley and Martinez; and so many others. Cycling, too, from Heidelberg to Handschuhsheim, and Heidelberg to Ladenburg past farms and piles of sour smelling mashed grapes as the leaves turned golden beside the path. Often with an index card with a sinewy poem or other beautiful wisdom on it to chew on.

It brought up also the Western feel and history of the word, similarly to how I feel whenever I hear “critical thinking” used in the academy, often as if its definition is obvious. (Which it isn’t.)

But really, as I told my new friend Paul, “I don’t know.” I really don’t know what contemplation is. The experience.

How do you describe how practicing the presence found you before you’d even heard of it or could even admit to yourself what was happening, when you used to leave the house and go out into the silent woods wandering aimlessly, like Mary Oliver says she did, and how nature saved her and nature saved and saves me? How do you put into words that kind Silence?

How do you explain that even as “God protects us from nothing,” as my friend Jim Finley says, how “God does not stop the cruel thing from happening, the unfair thing from happening, the abusive thing from happening,” how “God can’t sometimes do that,” how “the modality of the presence of God is not a God who protects the loss or the pain or the cruelty from happening,” but rather, as Jim continues, “God is the presence that unexplainably sustains us in all things on up to and including the moment of my death and beyond.” Jim reminds us: “I’m unexplainably sustained and I learn to rest in that. Resting in that, I see that God depends on us to do our best to protect ourselves and other people and to heal suffering wherever it occurs. Which is where social justice and the corporal works of mercy touch awakening.”

How do you find words for an experience like that that is both inexplicably Love and as accessible and as common as dust?

It’s Brother Lawrence’s “un je ne sais quoi,” and before him, John of the Cross and his “un no sé qué.”

But if I had to answer in one word? “What is contemplation?” I’d say contemplation is love.

It’s the enduring kindness of my husband with very human me, the also-unconditional tenderness of my mother since forever, and the gentle ways my friends know and support me, and how I support and know my family and friends, or, on personally dodgy days and in every I’m-a-human time, the ways I at least try. It’s the heartbreak of losing those you love, whether to illness or death or other changes or something else, since life has surprising ways to lose the most cherished beloveds. It’s the making it through dark nights of the soul as well as depression, and sometimes becoming confused when the two are not all that clearly delineated.

Love is finding a way through the cult-like raising of anti-therapy, pro-biblical-literalism evangelicalism to therapy, therapy as healthy and normal, and accepting somehow my therapist’s at first D- sounding diagnosis of “high-functioning depressive” and accepting I’d had suicidal ideations for decades, and going to therapy for years, the hardest schooling yet, and finding a way through decades of what D. W. Winnicott calls “the value of depression” and into a world that is now post-depression or, as my doctor says, “You are in remission from depression,” which though I don’t like the word remission much, does admittably make sense. I’m no longer depressed, but every day I work on being gentle with me, having good habits, slowing down, drinking water, eating well, breathing, staying in touch with friends, and in general accepting my place in the human family.

I have alerts in my phone that pop up every morning. Because I tend to forget essentials. One reminds me: “I am safe, I am loved, I am part of this human family.” Another addresses my lingering imposter’s syndrome at work: “They are lucky to have you! You’re the best!” It also reminds me that I am part of a team at Cal, a very kind, very student-centered community. Another alert asks, “What do I need now?” since I coped for years by focusing only on meeting others’ needs and neglecting my own.

Being asked about any word, even contemplation, especially contemplation, sends me as a nerd to the OED to discover where contemplation first occurs in English, or so far, where it’s been found to occur first. It’s in Ancrene Wisse, the 13th-century Guide (or Instructions) for Anchoresses. Ancrene means anchoresses. Think Julian of Norwich. Living in a 12’ x 12’ cell attached to a medieval church, with three windows, one open to the church, one open to the world, and one open to a parlor where food came in and waste went out. And the wisse is cognate with our word wit, so wisse, wit, and wise are rooted in *weid- “to see” and hence “to know.”

So if you ask me “What is contemplation?” I will go read Ancrene Wisse for the first time or might as well be the first time since I remembered nothing much about it.

And doing that, I remembered that my most beloved and enduring image of contemplation as experience is bird flight, with good reason. It’s not just me. It’s part of global mystical vocabulary.

Ancrene Wisse’s anonymous author gives an organic, alive, strong, wise, and gentle image for contemplation, that I translate here into Modern English as “the night-bird or owl flies by night and finds its food in darkness. In a similar way, the anchoress flies toward heaven by night through contemplation (that is, with high thought), and with holy prayers, and in darkness finds her soul food.” In Middle English: “þe niht-fuhel flið bi niht ant biȝet i þeosternesse his fode. Alswa schal ancre fleon wið contemplatiun (þet is, wið heh þoht) ant wið hali bonen bi niht toward heouene, ant biȝeote bi niht hire sawle fode.” Again, in Modern English, we hear: “The night-bird or owl flies by night and finds its food in darkness. In a similar way, the anchoress flies toward heaven by night through contemplation (that is, with high thought), and with holy prayers, and in darkness finds her soul food.”

This image helps me see why I never have identified with the “four steps” (reading, meditation, praying, contemplation) nor the “three stages” (purgation, illumination, union). This very first passage that (so far) in English has contemplation in it does not present contemplation as a step-by-step linear activity nor as some kind of ladder to climb or ascent to make; instead, contemplation is an ongoing flight. It’s recursive, repeated, ongoing, with natural rhythms interconnected with all of daily life.

Which reminds me of Das Jesus Gebet or The Jesus Prayer, given me by seventy-nine-year-old Mutti Buschbeck, my dear friend Sophie (well named, “wise”) whose Lutheran minister husband was contemporary with Dietrich Bonhoeffer and who similarly was imprisoned while a World War II chaplain, spending five years in a Russian prison camp, though he lived into the future and returned to his family, though emaciated.

This book was given me as I was emerging from anorexia. Mutti Buschbeck and I never discussed it, but she was wise and must have seen my fragile recovery and understood I was sick at age 22 when I was a Rotary Scholar at Heidelberg University, my first time abroad, and so homesick too. Every Friday she cooked me a roasted chicken and steaming vegetables, and I rode my little bike over from my dorm in Handshuhsheim.

I began reading this Christmas present she gave me, never having heard of the book or the prayer before. And because it was in German, I could take in its wisdom. Had it been in English I could not have. At the time I was totally burned and burned out by religious and other abuse on any words associated in English with Christianity. Here’s a translation of words that first came to me gently in German. They emphasize gentleness in contemplation, saying:

Even in the act of invocation of the Name, its literal repetition ought not to be continuous. The Name pronounced may be extended and prolonged in seconds or minutes of silent rest and attention. The repetition of the Name may be likened to the beating of the wings by which a bird rises into the air. It must never be labored and forced, or hurried, or in the nature of a flapping. It must be gentle, easy, and—let us give to this word its deepest meaning—graceful. When the bird has reached the desired height it glides in its flight, and only beats its wing from time to time in order to stay in the air. So the soul, having attained to the thought of Jesus and filled herself with the memory of him may discontinue the repetition of the Name and rest in Love. The repetition will only be resumed when other thoughts threaten to crowd out the thought of Jesus or Love. Then the invocation will start again in order to gain fresh impetus.

          Wow.

This kind of gentle taming of the mind in Love, with Love, and by Love heals, brings me self-compassion and active compassion for all others. It’s a work in (gentle) progress, and the materials for contemplation are the ways and days of life. All of it.

So when I remember the etymology of contemplation, I also remember Barbara Holmes and her wise emphasis on contemplation as community.

I always think of the C in Contemplation as also being the C in Community. Interdependence. I am you and you are me. I am because you are and you are because I am. The African philosophy of ubuntu. Where humans are seen as humans and interconnected with each other and with all creatures and with the earth.

How there is a Silence found in all noise, all music, all taxi honks, all symphonies, all bird songs, all groups singing, all choirs, all shouting, all deaths, all births, all.

I return too to etymology again, always grounding my dyslexic brain in roots, rootedness: Contemplatio / Contemplation has origins in either *tem- for “cut” or *ten- for “stretch.” Roman scholar Mary Beard reminds us, walking into an ancient temple somewhere, that “the whole purpose of a temple is to house the image of a god,” which here means LOVE.

We read that a temple is “a place dedicated to the service of a deity or deities, ground that is consecrated or set apart for the taking of auspices and the worship of a god,” as one dictionary reminds. In other words, it’s “a place reserved or cut out (*tem-)” from its surroundings and dedicated to such, or “a place where string has been stretched (*ten-) to mark off the consecrated ground.” Think also of your head’s temple, the flattened area on either side of your forehead, and we see temple’s roots here in *temp- from *ten– for “stretch,” meaning “stretched skin.”

To me, this is not speaking to a disconnect or a separation or even an isolation from others or from ourselves, but rather contemplation’s root of “to cut” reminds me to pause or “carve out” an atom of time and return to Love, and its root of “to stretch” reminds me that contemplation is an intention of returning to Love within and living that in my life. In the economy of Love, wanting to pray is also praying.

We don’t have to physically be anchoresses to return to this temple of Love within.

Another way that Paul’s question “What is contemplation?” is beneficial is that it is a reminder that I need good invisible food too. Contemplation, as the Cloud of Unknowing’s author says, is rooted in lectio divina, steeping in wise scripture verses that come from an anthology on love (and also other spiritual writings work like Mary Oliver’s divine poetry, Richard Rohr’s wise work, plus many others). We are humans, we forget the obvious. For the first fourteen or so centuries of the Christian church, lectio divina and contemplation were the path for all. Stepping back onto that wisdom path is not hard.

How was this wisdom lost? I think religious scholars began questioning how many angels could dance on the head of a pin. Which is very likely apocryphal as an example but very true as a notion of what scholasticism was about as a theology-philosophy. Meanwhile, people were starving in an unjust economy. I think how Marguerite Porete was burned at the stake on June 1, 1310, just for saying that religious scholars were “arrogant.” Every morning I wake and wonder how should I live and be in a world where people are hungry, where friends are working back-breaking jobs for no-healthcare and low-wages? Where education is not accessible? What can I literally contribute toward a more equitable economy? If one person is hungry and without healthcare, how must I act? And that influences my every decision.

I want to live and act from and “[a]t the still point of the turning world….at the still point, there the dance is,” as T. S. Eliot writes in “Burnt Norton.” 

I want to always go back to the roots of contemplation. Even as I remember that it is a Western concept and so is tainted with binaries. While for me it also overflows its origins and conjures up all goodness and kindness that is embodied in the beyond binaries worlds.

I must feed my mind-heart-soul-self-body something nourishing regularly, just like eating good food. Sometimes it’s “Wild Geese” by Mary Oliver, sometimes “Come to me, all you who are weary and burdened, and I will give you rest.” I can take “God is love” and spend hours, or the rest of my life with it. So many good and beautiful wisdom passages exist. We forget we can pick anything wise that resonates. Sometimes it’s a Stoic’s apothegm. Whatever a person finds words-wise that gives your life meaning. Whether that is literature of all sorts, scriptures of all faiths, all wisdom traditions, or a gem you found in a friend’s story.

Also, whenever scriptures are concerned, it seems that “steeping” in them would involve at some point reading them through all the way, several times, to get one’s own “gist” of what they are about, rather than just taking a few phrases out of context. To do so, studying them with diverse commentaries that dig into history, linguistics, and culture has helped me deeply. In the same way, reading all of Mary Oliver (prose and poetry) really helps a person more appreciate just one poem of hers that you might be meditating on repeatedly.

It also seems that if such a study of whatever material I have picked out for the steeping that is lectio divina doesn’t have its core meaning as “Love,” then I should really move on to some other passage or work that does, for meaningful, active, nourishing engagement with and of my True Self.

The experience of lectio divina, which involves lectio or deep reading or listening, meditatio or reflecting on healthy words, oratio or opening of the heart there, and contemplatio or entering the silence, makes us like our creature friends the cows, where juicy green words about the Mystery of Love are chewed until they become our very own milk that feeds the marrow of our own days, growing our self-compassion and active love for others, too.

It’s not hard. We just need an intention to. Hunger. A few good words to munch on. And chew. A desire to learn how to rest. To practice letting go.

And even if I don’t have the hunger sometimes, I can ask to have it or to have it renewed. All is possible.

The Cloud of Unknowing’s Anonymous writes in his sequel, Book of Privy Counsel, that contemplation is life, and he sounds very like Brother Lawrence here:

If your mind lets in any sort of thought about any particular thing outside your naked blind being (which is your God and your goal), it gets sucked into and trapped in the tricks and curiosity of your intellect, distracting your mind and alienating you from yourself and God. That’s why you must persevere in contemplation. Do it as often as you can. Grace will help you. When you persist in it and don’t give up, wisdom strengthens the inner poise you need to hold your soul whole and focused. Remember that contemplation is not an interruption to your daily life.

Instead, as you focus on this unseeing seeing of your naked being uniting you with God, keep doing what you always do: Eat and drink, sleep and wake up, walk and sit, speak and be silent, lie down and get up, stand and kneel, run and ride, work and rest; but at the hub of it all, you’re also offering God the most precious sacrifice you can make, this blind awareness. It’s the most important of all of your activities, active or contemplative. (Page 190 of Carmen Acevedo Butcher’s translation of Book of Privy Counsel, Shambhala, Chapter 7)

In other words, what is contemplation? It’s a habit, a good habit feeding the soul, and the soul is love. It repairs and heals us, as the Cloud’s Anonymous says, in love of self and others, and as we read in Chapter 9 of his Cloud, contemplation “benefits you and all of your friends and acquaintances, both living and dead.” I don’t understand how, but it encourages me endlessly.

To keep at it, cheerfully.

Faillir

One of my informal mindfulness practices is I look up the etymologies of words, every day, often. For decades. It’s the meditative version of all-you-can-eat BBQ Lay’s potato chips. I love BBQ potato chips, but at some point I have to say, One bowl is enough. Or one and a half. I can’t eat as many as I want every time I have some. Which by the way is daily with lunch.

But looking up etymologies? I can have another and another and yet another and then one more, and then again, another one. They form fractals of meaning in my awareness.

Every time I look up a word’s etymology, my mind expands in ways that joggle it loose from the larger binary system and into a spacious place of this and that and the other too, rather than this or that. Etymologies take me into the world of story, images, comparison, and yet another detail that complexifies my vision. This-that-and-the-other-too is one of my favorite places to be.

Sometimes I’m almost glad for having grown up with undiagnosed dyslexia. Out of decades of painful school days and feelings of shame, staring at the page with little sense-making, blurry cryptic dark marks moving so my mind could not decipher them, over time I became a lover of etymologies because knowing a word’s story and history gives it ballast. Letters slow, settle the paper, swap places more rarely. Not being able to read well also made me super grateful for kind teachers. Today when a d and b or c and s or now becomes know or know now or sense since or since sense, and etc., it is the uncommon not the every moment.

My dyslexia-cultivated this-that-and-the-other-too mindset taught me much about inclusivity. How truth always seems to have room for one more story, image, comparison, detail. For one more unique person.

I’m meditating on my love of etymology because this weekend I found myself reading truly for fun. First time in a long time. Because I finally finished a major project. I’m up for my 6 Year Excellence Review at UC Berkeley. That’s good fortune in itself, just to be up for it. But doing it has felt worse than stressful. Even though I am fortunate and have kind colleagues who are supportive, and great students, yet articulating what means most to me, teaching, and for public consumption, is my worst nightmare come alive, 24/7, and for months. A part of me always wants to hide, and not be seen, and truly that would not help me apply for a Continuing Lecturer position in College Writing Programs. So I did what I had to do and tried as I went through the process to center students’ voices, be self-compassionate, stay open of spirit, express my teaching philosophy and document my work, and express the gratitude I feel for this community.

Now it’s done. I uploaded it to the folder where it goes. I sent it on its way with a brave orison of well wishes. And celebrated this weekend in high fashion. I walked in the marsh without the burden of creating a self-statement and evidence file for my review. I bought some raspberry Danish rounds from Raley’s. I started reading Abigail Thomas’s What Comes Next and How to Like It: A Memoir. All good choices.

Thomas writes in a collage style I love. It’s like poetry and the best prose, all in one. Lyrical. Also grounded. She makes scenes we can enter. She’s real and kind. And genre-defying works have always been my jam. They resist the binary too.

I won’t spoil your experience of this memoir with any plot reveals. I’ll only say it’s a beautiful and moving work. At one point Thomas meditates on failure, speaking my language:

I am trying to convince myself that failure is interesting. I look the word up in the American Heritage Dictionary to find its earliest incarnation, but it has always been just ‘failure.’ There’s no Indo-European root meaning originally ‘to dare’ or ‘mercy’ or ‘hummingbird’ to make of the whole mess a mysterious poem. I can find no other fossilized remains in the word. Humility comes along on its own dime. (35)

Thomas sent me searching for failure.

It first turns up in the English language in the 1640s. Ironically in “a fayler of Justice in the highest Court of Justice.” This seems prescient. Failure there means “something not-occurring, an omitting to perform something due or required.” I wish we had confined failure to a legal term. An indicator that human rights have not been upheld. Because once it entered the binary slipstream of the English vernacular, it seems to have lost its compass for nuance.

In English, failure early on had different meanings too: “a lapse, a slight fault; weakness,” “the fact of becoming exhausted, breaking down in health, declining in strength,” and what it means mostly today: “not effecting one’s purpose; lack of success.”

That last definition, “not effecting one’s purpose,” seems to have become increasingly separated from a context of growing and recalibrating when we misstep or lapse or need to deepen our approach. Failure seems mostly narrowed today to mean “LOSER.” Against that, a whole industry of self-help books has arisen, like Megan McArdle’s The Up Side of Down: Why Failing Well Is the Key to Success. Which I bought recently when a student recommended it. Even its title leans into the binary of up and down, failure and success.

But what about the roots of failure?

To find these, we go back a few centuries, almost a millennium even. In Old French, in faillir. From the early 12th century on, faillir had abundant meanings: from “lacking,  missing, absent, short of, losing [something]” to “destroying,” “breaking an agreement,” “letting down,” “being unsuccessful,” “collapsing,” “missing a target,” “diminishing,” “being unprofitable,” “weakening,” “ceasing,” “malfunctioning,” “not thriving,” “deceiving,” even “not living a good life” (see an Anglo-Norman Dictionary here).

You find something similar in the seventeenth-century in France. In my much-loved A Dictionarie of the French and English Tongues compiled by Randle Cotgrave, faillir means:

To faile; slip, slide; erre, misse; mistake, misunderstand; offend, goe astray, doe amisse; also, to omit; lacke, wante; also, to quaile, decay, fade; faint, or tire; also, to deceive, or disappoint; also, to surcease, leave, end.

If we dig further, we find that our failure comes not only from the Old French faillir, but that faillir is from the Vulgar Latin *faillire, from Latin fallere, “trip, make fall,” and figuratively, “deceive, trick, cheat; be lacking or deficient.”

So, at heart, failure has a pratfall. I like to think of it as we’re doing our best and still stumble. We were aiming for the bullseye but hit the barn instead.

Even “lapse,” one of failure‘s early meanings, has roots in lapsus for “a slipping and falling.” Of course this reminds me of my friend Nicolas Herman. Brother Lawrence says to a friend of his who is discouraged, a nun, in letter 7 of my recent translation Practice of the Presence that we all “stumble,” get distracted and discouraged:

You are telling me nothing new in your letter. You’re not the only one who has distracting thoughts. The mind is extremely likely to wander, but the will is the mistress of all our powers, and must draw the mind back and carry it to God as to its final end.

When the mind has not been taught early on how to return, to be led back to itself, it can develop some unhealthy habits of becoming distracted and scattered. These are difficult to overcome. These tendencies ordinarily drag us off to earthly things, in spite of ourselves.

I think that a solution for this is to admit our stumbles and humble ourselves before God. During set times of silent prayer, I advise you not to use many words. Long discourses often create distractions. Hold still before God in prayer like someone who is poor, who is unable to speak or walk, and who is waiting at the gate of a wealthy person. Do your best to keep your mind in God’s presence. If it wanders or pulls away sometimes, don’t be discouraged. Distress tends to distract the mind rather than to focus it. We must use the will gently to bring it back. If you persevere in this way, God will have mercy on you.

An easy way of bringing your mind back during the set time of prayer and holding it there more at rest, is not to let it wander much during the day. Hold it attentively in God’s presence. As you get used to thinking of God from time to time, it will become easy to remain calm during times of prayer, or at least to bring the mind back when it wanders.

In my other letters I’ve already spoken at length with you about the benefits gained from this practice of the presence of God. Let’s devote ourselves to it seriously and pray for each other.

With his signature gentleness and calmness in mind, and with many talks coming up, recently I have been considering how much I need to feed myself good writing, good words, good reminders of what it means to be human. I think it’s a universal thing. Not just me. People of all faiths, wisdom traditions, and philosophies find such reminders in their various writings, scriptures, images, sculptures, tapestries, and more. Also, there is what some call secular poetry, literature of all kinds, and words of wisdom found here and there in unexpected places, fresh as dew. Some of us find food in all of these.

Lectio divina or “sacred reading” is how monks and nuns ate nourishing words in the communities that grew up around the teachings of Jesus, whose pedagogy was Love. Bede names us “animal ruminando,” or “ruminating creature,” meaning “ones who need nourishing soul food to chew on,” as I like to define it.

Since I have dyslexia still, sometimes it’s still hard for me to remember things, so I make mnemonics. Here’s one I made for lectio divina, which merely means “steeping in nourishing words that you like a lot.”

Although lectio divina is organic and not at all linear, we humans like to intellectualize it, flatten it, make it straight, aka, give it “steps.” Trying to tame the wild. One, two, three, four. Like that. It’s been going on since time out of mind. Looking at you, Guy.

Guigo 2, or Guy, was a French Carthusian monk of the 12th century. He wrote Scala Claustralium: Epistola de vita contemplativa or Ladder of Monks: Letter on the Contemplative Life. It breaks down contemplation into stages, seen below:

Lectio                     Read

Meditatio               Meditate

Oratio                    Pray

Contemplatio       Contemplate

My mind takes that and sees LMOC and RMPC and comes up with, after steeping in it a while:

Recognize            Love

My                         My

Peaceful               Other

Center                   Companions

These are more like clothespins to hold my thoughts on the line in the breeze, to flutter and dry, absorb the fresh smell of sun and wind.

And my dyslexic mind chews on their etymologies:

Lectio has in it legere, “collect, gather up, pick out.” That reminds me reading is an active process. & Read is cognate with reason and riddle. If instead of “Can you read this?” we said, “Can you riddle this?” that to me is reading, riddling.

Meditatio / Meditate is cognate with medicine, from med-, “to take appropriate measures,” and that etymology reminds me that being mindful is good medicine.

Oratio is cognate with orator, oral, and comes from *os- “mouth.” Orare meant “speak before a court or assembly, plead,” also “speak, pray to.” & Pray is cognate with precarious and has roots in “ask earnestly, beg (someone).”

Contemplatio / Contemplation has roots in either *tem- for “cut” or *ten- for “stretch.” A temple is “a place dedicated to the service of a deity or deities, ground that is consecrated or set apart for the taking of auspices and the worship of a god,” as one dictionary reminds. In other words, it’s “a place reserved or cut out (*tem-)” from its surroundings and dedicated to such, or “a place where string has been stretched (*ten-) to mark off the consecrated ground.” Think also of your temple, the flattened area on either side of your forehead, and we see temple’s roots here in *temp- from *ten- for “stretch,” meaning “stretched skin.”

“Reach My Peaceful Center, Love My Other Companions” / Read-Meditate-Pray-Contemplate & Lectio-Meditatio-Oratio-Contemplatio also mean to me self-compassion and recognizing (or remembering) that I (my True Self, or Love) am my own first companion and friend and that all others are made in the image of Love and are my companions. Where etymologically I’m reminded that companion means one or those with whom I break bread (com– “with” and pan “bread”).

Often, we seem to feel a “failure” in contemplation perhaps because our definition of failure needs a reboot and also perhaps because we haven’t fed our minds something nourishing first. Yes, you can do contemplation with a Mary Oliver poem, as one example of many. Whatever you find gives your life meaning. Whether that is scripture, literature of all sorts, or a gem you found in a friend’s story.

Also, whenever scriptures are concerned, it seems that “steeping” in them would also involve at some point reading them through all the way, several times, to get one’s own “gist” of what they are about, and to do so, studying them with diverse commentaries that dig into history, linguistics, and culture. In the same way, reading all of Mary Oliver (prose and poetry) really helps a person more appreciate just one poem of hers that you might be meditating on repeatedly.

It also seems that if such a study of whatever material I have picked out for the steeping that is lectio divina doesn’t have its core meaning as “Love,” then I should really move on to some other passage or work that does, for meaningful, active, nourishing engagement.

The experience of all deep reading or listening, meditation or reflecting on it, oratio or opening of the heart there, and contemplation or entering the silence, makes us like our creature friends the cows, where juicy green words about the Mystery of Love are chewed until they become our very own milk that feeds the marrow of our own days, growing our self-compassion and active love for others, too.

It’s not hard. We just need an intention to. Hunger. A few good words. And to chew. Learn to rest. Let go.

CÆDMON’S HYMN

“Cædmon’s Hymn” is a very early Old English poem, from around 650 to 680 CE, so 7th century. Our only source for it and for Cædmon’s life is Bede’s Ecclesiastical History of the English People. Bede describes Cædmon very much like the wealthy churchmen of Brother Lawrence’s day described the “uneducated” friar. Bede says Cædmon was an illiterate herdsman who lived at the Whitby monastery on the northeast shore of North Yorkshire. If that is true, we know for sure that he suffered very cold winters there, taking care of livestock.

The story of Cædmon has many versions. One says he couldn’t make music and so never played the harp or sang during gatherings. But one day he had a dream, and in it a man ordered him to “SING” something. Cædmon protested, saying he didn’t know how to sing, but the man in his dream insisted and Cædmon then sang about the Creator and in praise of God. The song he sang very much reminds me of my early childhood days of being in a church choir, and we sang “This is my Father’s world, and to my listening ears, all nature sings and round me rings, the music of the spheres.” I wish it had included “Mother’s world” and “Parents’ world.”

Cædmon had miraculously received the gift of religious song and became (like Brother Lawrence) widely known to the monks as a faithful, singing, and inspiring “lay brother.” According to Bede, Cædmon also composed other religious stories and poems which demonstrated his gift to the monks. But the only surviving one today is “Cædmon’s Hymn.”

Because no tape recorders existed in the 7th century, I created a melody for it two decades ago (while swinging my children on the playground), and I’ve been singing it very often ever since. As meditation. It is calming and I love its theme of gratitude for nature. Every day I’m grateful for the miraculous gift of nature.

You can listen to me sing it on my YouTube Channel here.

After I sing “Cædmon’s Hymn” in Old English, I sing it in my modern English translation.

Nu sculon herigean      heofonrices Weard,                                           

Meotodes meahte     ond his modgeþanc,                                             

weorc Wuldorfæder,     swa he wundra gehwæs,                     

ece Drihten,     or onstealde.                            

He ærest sceop     eorðan bearnum                              

heofon to hrofe,     halig Scyppend.                                                      

þa middangeard     monncynnes Weard,                                               

ece Drihten,     æfter teode                   

firum foldan,     Frea ælmihtig.

Now let’s sing everyday Mystery,

Maker’s matter and kind mindfulness,

our Parent’s gift of Creation and their Presence.

Our Friend made each wonder’s beginning,

first they shaped skies as a roof

for all the earth’s children.

Then sacred Shaper, present Friend

made the middle-world,

the solid ground

for everyone.

For these gifts we thank the kind Beloved!

This was recorded during an atmospheric river. So you hear the sump pump go off for a few seconds and also at the end you slightly hear some rain pattering down.

My translation makes the language more inclusive while cleaving to the original spirit and the words’ etymological roots. You can see the literal translation below if you wish.

Literal Translation:

Now we should praise the heavenly kingdom’s guardian!

The Creator’s power and His thoughts.

The work made by the Glory Father,

the eternal Lord, who established the beginning.

He first shaped, for earth’s children,

Heaven as roof, holy Maker.

Then the eternal Lord, mankind’s guardian,

next made the solid ground, almighty Lord!