Hide-and-Seek Divinity

When I was a stay-at-home mom and our daughter was almost three, she loved to play hide-and-seek. One time in Mountain View, California, she and I were playing hide-and-seek, just the two of us, on the dusty, shaded playground a short walk from our rented townhouse. School had just let out, so we had the playground mostly to ourselves. I hid first, and she found me fairly easily. Various anatomical parts of me stuck out from behind a skinny pine tree.

“Your turn to hide!” I sang out, and off she dashed with that nervous look that is the excitement of possibly “being found.” I just saw her back as she pumped her arms and scampered off, head down, searching for shelter.

I was a stickler for following rules then, and, as the oldest of four siblings, I always was; so I turned my back to my toddler and dutifully counted slowly to twenty, out loud. Then I turned around and started searching. I was serious about the search, too. I looked behind the slide, behind the skinny pine tree, behind the bushes, and just as I started across the playground, still searching, out dashed Kate yelling, “Surprise! Here I am! I found you!”

Huh? I said to myself and started to explain to her that that is NOT how the game works, when I stopped and thought, In this surprise is some spiritual lesson, but I’m not sure what. We played several more times, with her “hiding,” only to jump out sooner each time, shouting, “I found you!”

Decades later, I think back on this hide-and-seek game with my then toddler. By temperament, I spent the first fifty years of my life as a rules follower, someone preferring order, but over the years that preference has given way (often whether I’ve wanted it to or not) in the face of life as it is truly lived. My natural temperament that yearns for routine and schedule and predictability has eroded in the waves of living and loving imperfectly, as a wife and as a mom and then as a tenured professor, writer, speaker, now an adjunct professor, and the sand of my once seemingly ordered life has been carried out to sea.

I turn to scripture, wise books, and poetry for nourishment as I always have. They are lighthouses on the rocky part of the shore, faithfully there no matter the weather.

Over time, I forgot those playground games with my daughter. Then, one day not too very long ago, I found myself translating the fourteenth-century classic on lectio divina (sacred reading) and contemplative prayer, The Cloud of Unknowing (also here). In Chapter 46, I read words that reminded me of those hide-and-seek games with our daughter:

And don’t be hard on yourself. By that, I mean don’t overtax yourself emotionally or physically.
Choose to be enthusiastic instead. This discipline [of Bible meditation and contemplative prayer]
doesn’t require brute strength, but joy. As you increase the joy in your contemplative work, you also
increase its humility and genuine spirituality, but if you force it, your efforts sink into a crude
physicality. So beware. Remember that anyone approaching the high mountain of contemplation
with a beastly heart will be driven away with stones. . . . That’s why you should be careful. Instead of
being stubborn as a mule, learn to love with gentleness and joy, kindness and good manners.
Cultivate self-control of body and soul. Accept the will of our Lord gracefully. Never lunge for it like
a hungry dog. Even if you’re starving, don’t be a greedy greyhound. Don’t grab. Let me suggest
how you can do this. I’m going to advise you to play a sort of game with God, seriously. Pretend
you don’t want what you want as much as you want it. When you feel that beast, desire, stirring
inside you with tremendous power, restrain it. Act as if you don’t want God to find out how much
you long to see him, know him, and feel him. Hide all that. Perhaps I sound like a child making up a
game, but I mean it. I’m confident that anyone with the grace to put my advice into practice will
eventually experience the joy of God’s playfulness. God will come to you, the way an earthly father
plays with his child, kissing and hugging, making everything alright. (105-106)

“God will come to you, the way an earthly father [or mother, I say] plays with his [or her or their] child, kissing and hugging, making everything alright” — this wise observation reminded me that my toddler daughter was so confident I would find her that she didn’t even try to hide well. To her, the joy was in not quite hiding and then bursting on me as soon as I began searching. She has always loved to surprise me with her unique presence. Would that I were that child with God my Parent, I thought.

In devotional literature, it’s not unusual to find this hide-and-seek image. Often ancient Christian writers use diction and description to suggest that our relationship with God is not unlike a game of hide-and-seek between parent and child, which ends with the parent’s “finding” the child and covering him, her, or them with kisses and hugs.

In the thirteenth-century spiritual guidebook, Ancrene Riwle, another anonymous author writes, Ure Louerd plaieth mid us, ase the moder mid hire junge deorlinge. (“Our Lord-God plays with us as the mother with her young darling.”) The Ancrene Riwle passage then describes a hide-and-seek game in which God our Mother hides. Her child cries out, “Mother! Mother!” and God jumps out with open arms and cluppeth and cusseth and wipeth (“hugs and kisses and wipes”) our eyes. The Ancrene Riwle author uses this image to describe the experience of how God withdraws or “hides” His grace from us for a time, before returning to “find” us.1

The hide-and-seek image is used, perhaps, because it suggests the intimacy of those who play this child’s game. In the classic The Spirituality of Imperfection, Ernest Kurtz and Katherine Ketcham tell a story that helps me understand this experience:


The Medzibozer’s grandson, Yechiel Michael, was playing hide and seek with another child. He hid
himself for some time, but his playmate did not look for him. Little Yechiel ran to Rabbi Baruch and
said amid tears: “He did not look for me!”
The Rabbi said: “This is also God’s complaint, that we seek Him not.” (107)

But perhaps this next story from The Spirituality of Imperfection best helps me understand those games of hide-and-seek with my daughter and also my own dark, difficult, and despairing life experiences where I felt that God was “hiding” from me.

The story is told of a young girl who loves to wander in the nearby forest and one evening becomes lost. Her frantic parents gather their friends and search for her. She herself has become very anxious, after trying several different paths to return home to no avail, and she eventually falls asleep in a clearing. The searchers as well become exhausted and many stop looking. Her father, though, continues searching through the night.


Early in the morning, the father came to the clearing where the girl was asleep. He suddenly
saw his little girl and ran toward her, yelling and making a great noise on the dry branches which
awoke the girl.
The little girl saw her father, and with a great shout of joy she exclaimed, “Daddy, I found you!”
(108)

Kurtz and Ketcham write, “[W]e find what we are looking for only by being looked for” (108). “[W]e find what we are looking for only by being looked for.”

As we played together those many years ago, my toddler daughter found what she was looking for, the assurance of my searching for her, by jumping out and surprising me, upturning the “rules” of hide-and-seek because she could count on my being right there.

Sometimes, when I’ve felt in hard times that Love’s face is turned from me, that God who is my best friend is “hiding” from me, what jumps out at me is often my husband’s listening, a hug or a kiss from my children, a verse or poem, a loving friend checking in, a kind stranger, a deliberately intentional wise comment, my spontaneous wonder before a newly white dogwood or while listening to a poignant podcast, and God says, “Surprise! I found you!”

Or maybe I say, “Father/Mother/Parent/Love, I found you!”

Sometimes, in mutually loving relationships, it is almost impossible to tell who does the finding and who is the found.

So I keep praying that I embrace the grace to keep on seeking. Is the seeking the finding and the being found?

I pray to live in the middle place of Christ’s enduring, loving mystery where grace and seeking meet, in that liminal middle space of the numinous Now.

1. Find this passage in Nicholas Watson’s Anchoritic Spirituality (Mahwah, NJ: Paulist Press, 1991, page 132). This piece has been revised after being resurrected from my former iteration of this blog (2011).

Oddkins

“One’s whole life is in the work, in the writing and in the play.”

That’s Donna Haraway, a scientist-cultural activist-professor. In the documentary Story Telling for Earthly Survival by Fabrizio Terranova (58:02), Haraway presents my favorite beyond-colonial, beyond-patriarchal approach to being in the now, on earth, in community. It’s all about being present, embodied, here, now.

Her words also resonate with my translating. My whole life is in it.

It’s like the story of the shucked corn cobs Earcell would bring my family. She’d call about 5:30 of an evening: “Git your pot on, water a-boiling. I’m heading to the field. Be over tirectly.” That corn, with the freshest sugar, grown by our thoughtful generous neighbor, walked over and shared with us, then cooked by my mother, well, no other corn on the cob has ever, and I mean ever, tasted as delicious.

Translating sometimes reminds me of that freshest taste of the gift of just-picked corn.

The snow leopard, called “the ghost of the mountains,” is elusive and beautiful. Evolved to thrive in some of the harshest environments on our planet. Elusive also because its grey, yellow, brown-spotted pelage blends in with its rocky, snowy environment.

A good translator is a little like a snow leopard. If doing the job well, the translator may disappear into the text.

Resting Snow Leopard Credit: Assam, Creative License

A beautiful series of unending acts. Sometimes a translator sits down at a desk and respectfully makes the alchemy happen that slowly turns this text into another one. Other times translating is walking in the marsh or washing dishes or listening to students who’ve faced guns pointed at them merely because their skin is Black. Sometimes translating is resting.

In a world that worships this-or-that, one thing over another, translation is neither and both and something else entirely, all at once. Its essential nature is on the move. “Across and beyond,” trans places, trans times, trans people, it magically carries meaning and beauty and joy between multiple complex points, existing everywhere and nowhere.

Always in complex motion, and outside simplistic categorizing. Translators may be patted on the head and called “clever,” or praised for their “areas of expertise,” but only 44% of books carry their translator’s name on the front cover. That’s from Pamela Paul’s “Stop Pretending All Books Are Written in English” (May 29, 2022, NYT). Thankfully, Jennifer Croft, Jhumpa Lahiri, and many others are pointing out this “unique form of neglect.”

Author, critic, and translator working from Polish, Ukrainian, and Argentine Spanish, Croft asserts, “[I]t’s still considered almost a threat to name anyone other than the author.” Croft’s own Man Booker International Prize-winning translation of Olga Tokarczuk’s Flights doesn’t have Translated from the Polish by Jennifer Croft on the front cover, and Croft resolved, “I’m not translating any more books without my name on the cover” (Oct. 15, 2021, PW).

You’d also not know that the novelist and translator Jhumpa Lahiri translated Domenico Starnone’s novel Trust, because you don’t see Translated from the Italian by Jhumpa Lahiri on the front cover. Lahiri argues in Translating Myself and Others: “Translators are often described as being invisible, discreet, self-sacrificing presences. Their names are frequently absent on book covers; their roles are meant to be supportive. . . . Indeed, feminist scholars have argued that the practice of translation corresponds to traditional feminine archetypes in which a woman’s position and identity were subservient to a man’s” (May 12, 2022, TCC).

Lahiri adds that writing and translating are “two aspects of the same activity, two faces of the same coin, or maybe two strokes, that allow me to swim greater distances, and at greater depths” (May 29, 2022, NYT). Isn’t that superlative, I think to myself, another third way to look at the creative process that is writing and translating.

In the lyrical This Little Art translator and author Kate Briggs explores that third way in writing. Her book is fun to read, even if you don’t care about translation one bit, if you just love words and history and joy and walking around in Europe. My favorite books are genre-bursting, like Briggs’ essay, scholarship, novel, poetry, and philosophy all rolled into beautiful words, words you like, words I take in like I eat barbeque potato chips. Happily, simply.

I am blushingly, deeply in love with words. I admit it. When I translate, the sound of the words and their rhythms matter to me as much as their meanings.

As a kind friend and colleague, also a professional editor, pointed out to me recently, I am not likely meant to say, as on the About webpage I remade recently: “Carmen is the author of x-number-of books,” if some are translations. Aren’t translations books?

When my translation of Practice of the Presence is published by Broadleaf Books, I will have worked on, written, revised, translated, been translated by, and put my body, mind, heart, and soul into ten books, not even counting time invested in reissues, new editions, Audible releases, and the like, and even so, I can’t say I’m the author of ten books? Ah, words. Ah, world.

When I think of translating a work from one language and one time period into English and now, I think of how my “whole life” is in that translating, in the writing and in the high-serious play and joy of the countless little acts. I’m looking up innumerable etymologies of words, lovingly finding old dictionaries that offer words in their timely habitats of sentences from that period so I can see how they were used then. I’m also studying history and who knew Paris experienced a Little Ice Age and then floods in the late seventeenth-century.

And I’m letting the words and their meanings “happen” to me by entering into the entire wisdom of the work that translates me, so where past translations of Nicolas Herman see a word like bonté in French and just hear “goodness,” as a binary-system antithesis of “evil,” the Spirit shows me the “kindness” that exists outside a binary view and that is omnipresent in Brother Lawrence’s teaching. Which helps us create all sorts of relationships that Haraway sees as kinships she calls oddkins. These relationships include animals, trees, and yes, relationships human-to-human, with each other.

Noble laureate Olga Tokarczuk in the essay “Ognosia” translated from Polish by Jennifer Croft, calls this “multiorganismicity” (June 6, 2022), at Words Without Borders: “Complexity, multiplicity, diversity, mutual influence, metasymbiosis—these are the new perspectives from which we observe the world.” This essay is a must-read.

Alice Walker dedicates The Color Purple:

“To the Spirit: / Without whose assistance / Neither this book / Nor I / Would have been / Written.”

That dedication speaks to me and my experience of translating. How I best listen to the palpable silence. With my body, mind, heart, and soul alert to the Spirit, who seems a friend, and the Spirit is also my body, mind, heart, and soul, a third way, a fourth way, a fifth way opening. Way opens, meaning kindness.

Translation is how I find my way to more kindness.

Translating is bodyful. A term I take from Christine Caldwell’s Bodyfulness (Shambhala). New days need new terms. New ways of being-awake need new words.

Bodyfulness is her neologism. Caldwell says, “The body isn’t a thing we have but an experience we are” (xxv). She calls bodyfulness “attention during action,” “a purposeful and athletic ability to alter our attentional focus” so that “the amount and type of sensations we work with can be nourishing and deeply informative.”

Body as experience is a complex process of my capillaries, my acetylcholinesterase, my toes, my thinking, the water I drink, my breathing, grief, tears, saying sorry, meaning it and changing, my listening, my joy that we have the right to vote and have our votes counted, my worries for America, my love for others, my love for my self, the tang of coffee, the getting up, the sitting down, the walking, the snowy egrets, and always the dancing.

Caldwell is wise like Haraway. She says, “Humans invent words because we need language to articulate and share our experience with others, yet our words also actively shape how we perceive and move in the world.”

When a friend asked me to write down my translation philosophy recently, I thought, Translation philosophy? because until that moment I translated almost unselfconsciously, but when I sat down to do the task my friend suggested, out came the words embodied mysticism, which after reading Caldwell became bodyful mysticism. I translate because I love words and wisdom and kindness and self-compassion and changing and making community. Because I actually love making space in me for listening to an other, and then sharing their beauty, and it’s a puzzle I respect and it makes me sway and shimmy and spin . . . with myself and others.

Mysticism is not an elite word. Though it’s become rarefied. Treated like champagne when it’s really clean water and oxygen. It merely means my translation listens for mystery and makes room for mystery and respects mystery and honors mystery and opens for the kind Other in others, which cannot be worded, just as the mystic Marguerite Porete’s Loing Près is a Far Nearness happily decentering-Me while embracing me, and I others. This is the Something More healer Ann Bedford Ulanov often mentions, the Source of the Source.

Mysticism is ordinary. It’s a cup of tea, its steam rising. It’s not exclusive. Not housed in institutions. It’s certainly no gatekeeper. It’s a cup of coffee, its steam rising. It’s my breath on a cold day. Your breath. It’s working to make sure everyone can breathe.

Translation is also making oddkins. A portmanteau from Old Norse oddi, “third or additional number,” and Old English cynn, “family,” plus a soupçon of Octavia Butler’s parables, this neologism articulates Haraway’s vision of surprising ways of kin-making. She sees kin as “a wild category” that people “do their best to domesticate” but can’t. Oddkins expresses our need for “unexpected collaborations and combinations,” for “becom[ing]-with each other or not at all.” Making oddkins is “cultivating multispecies justice” among humans, dolphins, ants, corals of the seas and lichens of the land, orchids, bees, you name it.

Living on “Terra” during “disturbing” and “mixed-up” times, Haraway describes our “task” as learning to respond well by inventive kin-making, finding connections with each other, even though as humans we’re all a little “bumptious,” which is a sweet way of saying obnoxious, or as Merriam-Webster‘s puts it: “presumptuously, obtusely, and often noisily self-assertive.” Aren’t we all.

She sees oddkinning as a “practice,” a “response-ability” to make a “thick, ongoing present.” Echoing the wise Georgia Congressman John Lewis, she says, “Our task is to make trouble, to stir up potent response to devastating events, as well as to settle troubled waters and rebuild quiet places.” She teaches that “staying with the trouble” requires not focusing on an “awful or edenic” past nor an “apocalyptic or salvific” future, but instead on “learning to be truly present.”

“Learning to be truly present” is what Practice of the Presence is about. I spent the quarantine summer of 2020 and beyond in seventeenth-century Paris with Brother Lawrence, translating solidly. This dedication of my time deepened my lifelong walk with this simple practice that heals complexly. When out of the blue on June 9th, someone who read my translation of the Cloud of Unknowing, also a Companion of Julian of Norwich emailed me a gut-wrenching breath prayer: Slowly inhale, I can’t breathe and slowly out, Come, Spirit.

George Floyd’s presence is in Practice of the Presence too. So is Ahmaud Arbery’s and Breonna Taylor’s. As I translated, I began seeing Brother Lawrence, disabled veteran and an unremarkable Carmelite friar then, slipping into his self-repaired sandals, picking up a homemade #LesViesNoiresComptent sign, and marching down the rue de Vaugirard, with a profound limp.

Making oddkins happens where, when, how? Here, now, being present. Haraway translates her vision into a new word. To learn to be present and stay with what Lewis names “trouble,” Haraway renames our present age, seeing the traditional term for our “current geological age,” Anthropocene, as limited, limiting. For our “transformative . . . timeplace” Haraway makes the “simple word” Chthulucene, pronounced, / ˈTHOO luh scene / (Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene).

Chthulucene envisions our present moment, with its “vastly unjust patterns of pain and joy,” as the time “to make trouble” by “staying with the trouble . . . [through] learning to be truly present.” Chthulucene is the present moment where we take the third way of sym-poiesis, or making-with all other creatures. Haraway believes, “We become-with each other or not at all.” That’s why she coined Chthulucene by marrying the Greek khthôn/χθών or “earth,” with kainos/καινός or “now . . . thick, ongoing presence.” (Which is very much what the friar’s practicing the presence is: “being present now on earth.”)

Brits keep the initial “k” for χ, but mostly it’s dropped from khthôn/χθών, and the word starts with θ or “th.” A fun word to say, it’s also beautiful. It lands on the tongue like life and love: / ˈTHOO luh scene /. Its sound doesn’t match its looks, which is just the kind of vertigo love makes. Like the word kin, Chthulucene is a “wild category” open to untold healthy possibilities. It’s more inclusive and generates more joy and more opportunities to connect in “unexpected collaborations and combinations,” rather than Anthropocene, which centers man in anthro and excludes other creatures.

We’re all kin and wildly, wonderfully odd. We’re here now, on earth, made of dust, together.

And as my very bones know, translation is a process some may also call, yes, love.

Brown

“Look. They’re brown.”

This whisper glides effortlessly across the bituminous tarmac with the lazy downward drift of a paper airplane perfectly creased then released. It sounds astonished, not malicious. Escaping with crystal clarity under the cracked-open glass of a narrow, five-foot-long steel-awning schoolroom window, it reaches the Fiver-like, olive-skinned ears of a skinny eleven-year-old, whose bony shoulders have already begun hunching for other reasons. For one, she’s an introvert who loves books. Hearing this surprisingly feral, disembodied curiosity, they inch an indiscernible fraction more in the direction of the cloudless sky, as she and her family navigate a scorching asphalt parking lot, a patch of melting blackness stranded smackdab in seemingly endless, green, cow-grazing pastures.

With each step, left then right, new sneakers reluctantly leave the sunned and sticky surface with a slight suck-suck sound.

She focuses her gaze resolutely forward, refusing a strong impulse to look left where the long pushed-out window is, but all the same she feels unseen eyes on her and her two sisters.

Her ears burn.

“ÆSˈ ə veɪdʌ.”

“HⱭTˈ pəˈteɪˌtʌ.”

“OƱˈ sʌˈvi doʊ.”

That’s roll call. I wince and pull the corners of my lips up and go along. It’s one reason today I pay attention to how my students’ names are pronounced.

It’s / Ɑˈ səˈveɪ doʊ /, I would say now.

At that point, though, we’re the only Acevedo in the White pages of the phone book. When I check, twelve by then, I don’t need another reason outside my own changing body to make me feel alien and not belonging, but there it is. 

This changing makes me self-conscious because it feels like a threat. My bones warn, You drew the short gender straw. My mind asks how long I’ll evade the consequence by choosing too-big t-shirts that bury tender, growing peaks brushing up against their cotton, simultaneously thrilling and scaring me in a society signaling they will not be mine.

At home in the blue-green foothills of the Blue Ridge Mountains, I grow up eating steaming plates of fried chicken with collard greens and arroz con pollo, not at the same meal. My family and I fork fried liver and onions into mashed potatoes, and spoon black beans with rice and pork. We devour hot fluffy biscuits, we consume fried ripe plantains. We eat salty beef stew, we have spicy chicken fricassee. We enjoy homemade lemon meringue pies, and caramelized flan.

I drink gallons of ice-cold sweet brown tea. I mean Petticoat Junction water towers of it. Also as a kid visiting my dad’s relatives in Miami, I’m granted a grown-up’s breakfast that stars a hot demitasse cup filled to the brim with espresso-shot café con leche, and to the side, toasted Cuban bread for dunking. That is heaven.

Then for lunch we go out with an aunt who always wears bright colors and perfume even to a corner store for some Cuban sandwiches. That simple, underestimated combination of Cuban bread with ham, pork, cheese, pickles, mustard sets a never surpassed standard for sandwich excellence. In between meals, my cousins sneak my brother and me sugary contraband chunks of gritty dark-red guava paste sandwiched between impossibly thick, wonderfully creamy slices of sharply savory orange cheese.

My father and me
My mother and me

With a White mother and a Brown father, I’m born into multiculturalism. At first it means summer trips to Florida from Georgia, a hardworking, taking-nothing-for-granted, overcompensating, flamboyant, brave grandfather who has a thick accent and difficulty with plurals, a different skin tone from those around me, and more, delicious food choices.

It becomes that happy energy I love when my aunts and uncles are all talking at once sitting on the front steps after supper, becoming more animated as the light goes and filling the night air in Little Havana with one “¡Mira!” and “¡Claro que sí!” after another, and smoke curling up from waved cigarettes. It’s being kissed on one cheek, then the other, often, hugged and patted by everybody.

It’s the flickering strangeness of tall votive candles lit and left burning at all hours, with figures on them like a woman looking down, eyes closed, her hands pressed together, dressed in a colorful robe from head to toe, short yellow-orange rays outlining her body. It is also on display on a table in one uncle’s TV room—the biggest, heaviest, loveliest round glass bottle I’ve ever seen, holding a darker-than-tea liquid, and when the sun shines through the window, it looks like amber, but the label on it reads R-U-M.

My skin is not as dark as my Miami cousins’ nor even my father’s Café Bustelo café-con-chocolate tone, since mine has a splash of my mother’s milk and of his mother’s added to it. I’m neither this nor that, but I love my olive hue, write about it in my journals, and feel very Brown looking at those around me.

This mixed-race background, and my gender, are not a fit for the 1970s-1980s South. I look and look for my place. Exclusively run by one end of the Fitzpatrick scale, and by strict commands in Genesis for some to “rule over” me, this world affords me scant space.

But my brave, indefatigably cheerful, hardworking mother faithfully makes PTA phone calls, organizes school fundraisers, bakes endless pound cakes that squeak, cleans up after Halloween school fests, keeps babies in the church nursery, and always makes time to do whatever others ask of her. The community’s respect for her many contributions plus her pigmentation largely protect me.

I thought even then, Others live differently from me—is so fascinating. It makes me feel alive tasting strangely sweet, sandy guava paste for the first time between two smooth slices of tangy cheese. It’s what I think going to school should be like, truly learning, without the torturous spelling tests and other challenges. Multiculturalism experienced as family and self is my first inoculation against society’s suffocating, and inherently violent binary codes.

The main discrimination for megender. Two exist then, one strong, one weak. One free, one government-legislated. One virile, one hysterical. I see a future of dishwashing, cooking, and diaper-changing ahead of me. A curtain coming down at the end of a play. Early on I sense that to complain about each unfairness will require constant interruption, incur punishment, and I’ll never get to do the things I want, so I know my place and stay in it, and work like the devil.

This prejudice is mainlined three times a week when my parents take my younger brother and two sisters and me on Wednesday nights and twice on Sundays—with the precision of an addiction—to a Southern Baptist church. Women are not equal with men there. This inequality does not make a person feel like a person.

We’re the only mixed-race family in the pews under that sharply white steeple. My mother and brother look local, she teases the mailman must’ve come through, but the rest of us are decidedly other. Still, my handsome father, who looks a lot like a Cuban Elvis Presley, becomes a glad-handing deacon and gets to stand solemn at the end of pews, one brown hand over the other, both resting where his jacket buttons, waiting straight as a sentry for the gleaming shallow dish, heavy with quarters, to make its way back.

During long church services dark suits stride cleanly up the steps to the pulpit to speak. Often they scream at me with authority. Decreeing women are made inferior by God and are required by divine law to be subservient to their husbands. In Sunday School I’m trained in Evangelical womanhood, which is that the highest, most noble possibility in life is marriage to a man, serving him as my superior; children shall follow, and the woman shall raise them.

As a child, this arrangement puzzles me to no end. If God is loving, how could he make me less-than someone else? Why do just men speak from raised places of power? Why do they shout angrily at me in church, towering over everyone else, while quiet women are always invisibly working, doing things behind-the-scenes that keep the church ticking over?

These questions have never been answered.

My school years are a mess. That likely makes me a kinder teacher.

We move once every two years or so, as my father has difficulty holding a job, and I find it hard to form new friendships that often.

As a student, I always feel wrong, incapable. Reading seems impossible. The words will not stay still. They float in and right back out. Letters switch places, s and c, d and b. Also words like now, no, know. I can’t focus. Standardized reading tests are the worst experience. They make my brain seize and halt. You have to read a passage you have no relationship to, like some jargon-laden textbook excerpt, which wouldn’t intimidate me today, but as a high school student, I’m caught in an undertow. At home we have Reader’s Digest, Guideposts, plus Billy Graham’s Angels on the lid of the toilet tank.

I get in trouble for talking in class. I have several years where I must have been such an annoying student. I try to remember that now, as a teacher. There’s even a black-and-white elementary school photo where I’m turned around talking to someone behind me. In another city a teacher puts me out in the hallway, right beside the classroom door, and the rite of passage is that kids file by on their way to the lunchroom and snicker and point. Even earlier, I’m sitting on a bench waiting for my mother to come pick me up, lucking out since she drove my father to work that day and has the car, and the memory is of soaked underpants and the soggy back of a Singer-sewn dress sticking to the cold metal, making me shiver.

I don’t begin to understand these failures until I’m helping a student who describes his difficulties with reading, which I silently notice resemble my earlier ones, and he says, “I have dyslexia.” I’ve never heard that word before, or if I have, it hasn’t registered. Next I happen on “Words Failed, Then Saved Me” by poet Philip Schulz in the New York Times, describing his late-diagnosed dyslexia, and it resonates. I’m like Ah, I see. I’m well into middle age, too, when I begin to have some compassion for my struggling childhood self.

Today the letters and words rarely switch places, but on occasion they do so gently, without impeding my reading much now. But from kindergarten through college, and beyond to a Ph.D., undiagnosed dyslexia causes me untold grief. I cannot focus and am always anxious. I never sit down to a college test that I’m not holding one hand over my stomach as cramps begin an hour before it and only subside that evening, only to start again with the next test.

Still, I have a deep well of stubbornness, which turns out to be useful. I like books, I just can’t read well. So I read and read and read. One of my favorites is Watership Down. It’s hard going, but life-altering experiences like identifying with the puny rabbit with a sixth sense are what keep me pushing and very gradually allow the act of moving my eyes over printed pages to become one of my greatest joys.

But I remain frustrated for years, watching as friends nail perfect SAT scores and big scholarships to expensive schools. My standardized test scores lag. It’s embarrassing.

My friends have firm plans to go to college. I envy them. Studying is painful, hard, and slow, but I want to go to college too. I’m chopping coleslaw at Granny’s Fried Chicken when my father says to me: “You can’t go to college. I’ve got three more kids after you. I can’t afford it. Don’t ask me again.”

We live in an unincorporated community called Macedonia, near the then equally small town of Canton, Georgia, which doesn’t have a movie cinema. We have well water. It’s soft on hair but bad on teeth. I love our neighbors Hoyt and Earcell, they raise chickens and garden, and let me ramble for hours over their rolling green pastures and woods whenever I am sad or bored or need to flee problems at home, walking miles with only the red-tailed hawks soaring overhead for company. But I itch to see more of the world.

Some teachers help me, and I do the work. Even though I see no progress. What else is there? Behind my father’s back, I apply to colleges, paying for the fees with money from my fast-food job, hoping scholarships will happen that will enable me to go to school; otherwise, I cannot go.

Miraculously they do. I choose the school that offers me the most money. It’s an award-winning liberal arts college offering small class sizes, each not over twenty students, and individual teacher attention for every student. The downside is it’s only two hours from my home in northwest Georgia, but it’s a start, a chance.

Once there, however, I feel awkward. I’m on academic and need-based scholarships and do work-study as a secretary to pay for the expensive books. I type for a professor while many classmates drive new cars. Kind teachers, friends who overlook my oddities, like the semester I wear blue bib overalls solidly, and my doggedness somehow see me through.

My sophomore year brings an unexpected freedom. My Cuban grandfather shoehorns people’s feet into espadrilles and brocades and Oxfords and boots and sneakers and more at a department store, and when he shoehorns enough pumps onto middle-aged women’s callused feet, flashes his mustachioed grin, and charms them into purchases with his enthusiasm, he’s able to buy his long-awaited Oldsmobile Delta 88, and gives me his ten-year-old, faded green Vega. I feel like I am driving a Cadillac. I’m so happy, I don’t care I must turn the AC off to go more than 10 mph up hills, or that it requires me to store quarts of oil in the back and chug in one or more every other time I fill up with gas, or that sometimes it belches heavy white smoke, sometimes black, causing one motorist to shake his fist at me through the fog.

When Ortega (the Vega) dies a few years later, I get a used, dark blue metallic Chevy Chevette hatchback. It looks how a car would if it were mimicking a sneeze, the tiny wheels especially. It, a teaching assistantship, suppers of tuna, canned mixed vegetables, baked potatoes, sometimes Ramen for variation, and not otherwise shopping, for my mother keeps making my dress clothes, carry me through grad school in Athens.